movies

Too Many Summer Movies 2010

Posted on

Just in time for the summer blockbuster season is my list of movies that I will hopefully see either in the theatre or much more likely on my television screen at home. This is the fourth time I’ve made such a list and its been very helpful in remembering what movies I (at least at some point) wanted to see.
In updating these previous posts to cross off the movies I’ve actually seen, I was disappointed to note that I only saw 1 out of the 11 films I wanted to see over this past holiday season. Also, in the process of checking up on my viewing progress, I decided to rename two previous posts where the word “Winter” was replaced by “Holiday” as these movies covered the 2009/2010 holiday season and not winter (which is technically December 21st through March 21st).
So, here in order of release, here the 37 (!) films that I would like to watch this coming summer season: The Infidel, Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll, Babies (playing at “The Paris” – I hope to see it there as I’ve never been to that classic movie house before), Iron Man 2, Robin Hood, After the Cup: Sons of Sahknin United, Holy Rollers, Macgruber, Perrier’s Bounty, Solitary Man, Sex and the City 2, Agora, Micmacs, The Prince of Persia: Sands of Time, Get Him To The Greek, Killers, Whiz Kids, The A-Team, Jonah Hex, The Last Airbender, Twelve (must read book first), Cyrus, Despicable Me, Predators, Inception (new by Christopher Nolan – one of my favorite directors), Dinner for Schmucks (also known as any holiday meal – I kid, I kid…), Life During Wartime, Centurion, The Other Guys, Animal Kingdom, Down Terrace, The Expendables (starring Sly Stallone, Dolph Lundgren, Eric Roberts and Mickey Rourke – I am not making this up), Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, A Film Unfinished, The Freebie, The American, Born To Be A Star

ramblings

No more PPT for CENTCOM

Posted on

“We have met the enemy and he is a bloated Microsoft Office Suite product!” ~ paraphrase of Gen. McChrystal
Some choice quotes from this NYT article all about how “Like an insurgency, PowerPoint has crept into the daily lives of military commanders and reached the level of near obsession” are as follows:

  • “PowerPoint makes us stupid,” Gen. James N. Mattis of the Marine Corps, the Joint Forces commander.
  • “It’s dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control,” General McMaster
  • “I would be free tonight, but unfortunately, I work kind of late (sadly enough, making PPT slides).” – Lieutenant Nuxol
  • “Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable,” General McMaster

You have got to love the pun in the last one in the list. The image below is a PowerPoint diagram meant to portray the complexity of American strategy in Afghanistan which certainly succeeded in that aim.

The article makes me think of my Tufte related post from back in Jan, 2005 about how PowerPoint was incredibly bad for information dissemination and five years later, the game is still the same. Now though, lives are on the line so, let’s say it all together now: PowerPoint is bad, mmmkay?

politics

The Only Way to Combat the Inevitable is to Make it Irrelevant

Posted on

I was out to dinner with two political friends of mine this past Saturday night and I wound up codifying a belief that I’ve had since the Supreme Court ruled in favor of corporate money flowing relatively unchecked into political campaigns: money will always be a part of politics. So, the only way to combat it is to make money itself irrelevant.
The way this can be accomplished is by creating the conditions where it does not matter if one spends one to possibly five billion dollars during a campaign, note that this figure is before the special interests get involved. Through either scheduling, or media restrictions, or other means unknown or unstated at this time, the conditions need to be set so that any ungodly sum of money is taken off the table when it comes to any election.
I manage digital projects for a living and there quickly gets to be a point where throwing more bodies at a problem does not generate positive results. Twelve coders working in parallel cannot complete a relatively short term goal most often. To complete the task, you want two coders to sync and be left alone for a week or so to bang it out. The same must be true for campaigns and their cash – they need to have negative results for throwing more money at the problem. If this happens, then maybe we’ll start to see our political discourse and system reformed in a way that sticks for a good bit of time.

art

Pixel Perfect

Posted on

When you receive a video from two different people who found it on two different sites, you know its probably going to be good. That’s what happened today with the video “Pixels” by Patrick Jean which is embedded below.
First, I received an email from a friend with a subject line that read “Very cool video” but I was too busy to watch. Then, later while at work, I received a company-wide email that was sent by a co-worker which only had a subject line that read “Pixels.” Someone responded a few minutes later with “That was dope” so I watched and agreed – it was dope. After watching the video, I then went back to my buddy’s email and sure enough, it was a link to the same thing.
So, check out the video below and let me know what is your favorite part. Mine is the Tetris scene. ‘Nuff said.

PIXELS by PATRICK JEAN.
Uploaded by onemoreprod. – Discover more animation and arts videos.
UPDATE: My RSS feed had an article from the NY Daily News about how Pixels is burning up the Net
Via Neu and Erick

health

By A Healthy Margin of 7 Votes Reform Passes

Posted on

Much has been written and said about the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which now provides and/or mandates health care for 95% of all Americans. I’ve waited to listen to as many viewpoints as possible throughout the entire process before weighing in which is different from the way I’ve operated in the past. When looking back at previous years and causes, I would sometimes post many times in a single week about a given political topic, especially when it involved something idiotic Bush the Second or the Republican party (more on them in a bit) did or said. So, considering that health care reform is something that I care deeply about, my absence of comments on this issue up until now has been nothing less than the the model of restraint.
Part of my hesitancy to voice my opinion was due to my overall disgust of the public sausage making that passes for our government these days. Its an embarrassment and I feel like I’m being led by a nation of children.
The other part of it was that my relationship with the health care sector of this country has been so ridiculously involved in relation to the amount of medical issues I ave either known about or had to tangentially deal with that I am quite emotional about the issue. If I started to post on it, there would be no going back, this blog might have simply turned into a “health care reform all the time” blog. Over my lifetime, I’ve had constant access to and interaction with our country’s medical establishment: doctors and nurses, waiting rooms and offices, procedures and exams, infirmaries and hospitals, operations both out-patient and in-patient – you name it, I’ve experienced it, and most from an early age. At most points I was a care giver and observer. At others I was the patient. At most times I managed the bills and fought to ensure that I maximized my coverage options and benefits. Its a tricky business and you need to be quick on your feet – not easy to do any day and especially not when injured – but I’ve developed a specialty for it. I’ve known my entire life that our system needed to be improved. After Clinton tried and failed, and as our country descended into nonsense land (see both terms that Bush was in office and mostly everything that our nation’s government did during that time), I just put on the back burner of my hopeful mind that anything good would ever happen. But unbelievably and almost improbably, especially after Ted Kennedy’s seat was won by a Republican, it happened.
In the end, the final vote was 219 – 212; 7 votes separated the biggest piece of social net legislation in a generation from success or defeat. 7. That’s it. Razor thin but still wide enough.
For over a year now this legislation has been proposed, debated, revised, debated, rinse and repeat ad naseum. In the end, an unorthodox randomly used but legal procedural move was needed in order to get this legislation passed, again by the slimmest of margins. What did we pass? Something that will cost about a trillion dollars over 10 years – supposedly that is a good thing. I have yet to talk to my doctor cousin and friends about what it means to them and what they think. Its helpful to understand what a leader of a university hospital and two Harvard MDs think of this whole shebang because I haven’t been able to read the 2,000 pages of the act. Right now, I just feel that the high level provisions that the bill enforces, such as banning a company’s ability to drop coverage based on pre-existing conditions and keeping minors covered longer to name just two, are simply morally correct.
There are plenty of drawbacks and loopholes that still need to be closed and many of the provisions do not kick in for four long years, during which plenty of healthy people will get sick and sick people will getter sicker and/or die, so it is flawed and no by no means perfect. That being said, what the act does provide is far and away better than anything that is currently in place. It provides a foundation to build upon for further and future reforms.
Those that oppose this bill – mostly rapid Republicans and Tea Party folk – have been raucous in their dismissal and hatred towards it. “It reeks of Big Government, its socialist, its too costly, its dangerous” they cry. They support tacitly those that debase decorum and attempt to spit (literally) on the civil rights of black war veterans. Not a single Republican voted for the bill and thirty or so Democrats voted against it which boggles my mind, because again I feel that it is morally right and if they [the right wing nutters that so strongly opposed the bill] are so Christian, isn’t healing the sick something Jesus would do? As Bob Herbert has written in his piece “An Absence of Class”, he correctly points out that “For decades the G.O.P. has been the party of fear, ignorance and divisiveness” and that it “is the party that genuflects at the altar of right-wing talk radio, with its insane, nauseating, nonstop commitment to hatred and bigotry.” I think this health care reform vote will go down in history as the day that America went both crazy and sane and then sadly crazy, crazy because not a single Republican went on record to support this obviously overall decently good bill and sane because it got passed but sadly crazy because the side of good needed the loopiest of ways to pass the darn bill.
Kudos POTUS, Pelosi and the others that strong armed this bill to the finish line.

music

Tuesdays Are Now Cover Days

Posted on

The Onion’s A.V. Club launched A.V. Undercover this past Tuesday and I’m stoked about the concept. The Undercover program will have 25 bands select from 25 songs to cover. Once a week (Tue) the songs will be covered one by one. Once a song has been played, it cannot be played again so the band next week has one less song to choose from. Therefore, there is a reason to get in early if you are picky. By my math, this will whole thing will last until August 31st.
The 25 songs that were selected are pretty diverse – running from Starship’s “We Built This City”? to Nirvana’s “Sliver” with lots of side trips in between. There are some inspired choices and Teo Leo and the Pharmacists led things off with their rendition of Tears for Fear’s “Everybody Wants To Rule The World” and did a bang up job with it. I am now looking forward to Tuesdays specifically to see / hear who is going to bust out what. Fun stuff.

politics

The True Nature of Our Economy

Posted on

The art imitating life imitating art quality of the Onion sometimes just leaves me breathless with the way they nail the absurdity of our lives head on. Their recent post U.S. Economy Grinds To Halt As Nation Realizes Money Just A Symbolic, Mutually Shared Illusion shines a bright spotlight on the man behind the curtain of our ATM. There is nothing backing up our money except our shared belief / delusion that its worth value. Period.

“It’s just an illusion,” a wide-eyed Bernanke added as he removed bills from his wallet and slowly spread them out before him. “Just look at it: Meaningless pieces of paper with numbers printed on them. Worthless.”

By the time you get to the end of the article, you’ll be laughing too hard to want to get a gun and gold and run off into the woods.

health

On Depression's Upside

Posted on

Jonah Lehrer’s recent article in the Gray Lady about depression’s possible upside was provocative, insightful, intelligent, dangerous and a whole slew of other adjectives.
While some psychiatrists regard the theory that depression can be good for you “as little more than irresponsible speculation, a justification for human suffering,” others are buying into it.
The types of depressed people who do not bathe, neglect their kids, etc – those need real help and real medicine. But for a lot of others, the scientists that Lehrer centers on, Andy Thompson and Paul Andrews, basically are saying that “if depression didn’t exist — if we didn’t react to stress and trauma with endless ruminations — then we would be less likely to solve our predicaments. Wisdom isn’t cheap, and we pay for it with pain.” That line would make a great poster – I can see across a backdrop of a boxer getting clobbered right in the face (more on fighters later).
The passage below comes towards the end of the rather long article. The Andreasen mentioned in it is neuroscientist Nancy Andreasen who conducted a study of 30 writers from the Iowa Writers’ Workshop which found that eighty percent of the writers met the formal diagnostic criteria for some form of depression. Shocker! She never saw my 300 level creative writing class but it was the same story.

Why is mental illness so closely associated with creativity? Andreasen argues that depression is intertwined with a “cognitive style” that makes people more likely to produce successful works of art. In the creative process, Andreasen says, “one of the most important qualities is persistence.” Based on the Iowa sample, Andreasen found that “successful writers are like prizefighters who keep on getting hit but won’t go down. They’ll stick with it until it’s right.” While Andreasen acknowledges the burden of mental illness — she quotes Robert Lowell on depression not being a “gift of the Muse” and describes his reliance on lithium to escape the pain — she argues that many forms of creativity benefit from the relentless focus it makes possible. “Unfortunately, this type of thinking is often inseparable from the suffering,” she says. “If you’re at the cutting edge, then you’re going to bleed.”

Powerful stuff. This article had two bonafide great lines, the one earlier about wisdom and the one above about bleeding on the cutting edge. If you read the article, post a comment and I’ll be happy to respond. This is one of those topics that could engender a lot of conversation.

politics

Tea Anyone?

Posted on

In the past week, both Time and The New York Times have published very good in-depth articles about the Tea Party Movement. If you ever wanted a good background on the subject, read who they discuss what is fueling it, what various groups fall under its vast umbrella, what these groups believe in and how their natural decentralized inclinations may prevent them from truly being as powerful as they might scarily be. As the NYT says, “it is an amorphous, factionalized uprising with no clear leadership and no centralized structure.” One thing is for certain: they are mad as hell and just aren’t going to take “this” anymore!

If you aren’t familiar with the film “Network” (where the clip above is from), you should know that it came out in 1976 – a good long 33 years ago. The fact that this has happened before just sadly means that will all happen again. Its happening now and that is bad enough.
What can do we do about what is going on? Is anyone truly satisfied with what is happening in this country? I have my own thoughts, but that is for a different post.
Bill Maher is someone who didn’t hear the calling the way Tea Baggers, as he calls those in Tea Party Movement, did. Tea Baggers to him are protesters who are longing for the return of the 1950s in America, who are 99.99% white, are who are extremists and so on and so forth. To hear it out of his mouth, check out the video below from his recent HBO special ” …But I’m Not Wrong” – enjoy.